Why court adjourns Nnamdi Kanu’s trial indefinitely

Date:

Share post:

Justice Binta Nyako of the Federal High Court, Abuja, has indefinitely adjourned the trial of Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra.

The decision, made on Monday, follows Kanu’s insistence that Nyako cannot preside over his case, citing her previous recusal.

Kanu was brought into Nigeria in June 2021 and has since been detained and tried for alleged terrorism. His trial was stalled after Justice Nyako recused herself from the case following an oral application by the defendant on September 24, 2024.

The IPOB leader had directly told the judge that he no longer had confidence in her handling of his trial.

However, the Chief Judge of the Federal High Court, John Tsoho, reverted the file to Nyako on the ground that Kanu’s application must be brought formally before the court through a motion on notice.

Consequently, in a letter dated December 5, 2024, addressed to the Deputy Chief Registrar, Adegboyega Awomolo, the prosecution counsel, asked the court to fix a date for the commencement of the trial.

Opposing the request for a trial date, the defence counsel, Aloy Ejimakor, in a letter dated December 9, 2024 said the ruling of the judge recusing herself remained valid.

Subsequently, Ejimakor asked that the case be transferred to a Federal High Court in the South-East if no judge in Abuja is willing to preside over it. His prayer, however, did not see the light of day.

At the resumed hearing on Monday, February 10, 2025, Justice Nyako said the chief judge had not accepted her recusal and had referred the case back to her.

She asked the defence team led by Ejimakor to come up with a written application if they still insist on the recusal.

Earlier, the Prosecution counsel led by Adegboyega Awomolo, said they were ready for the commencement of trial as his witnesses were ready.

Poor Knowledge Of Court Affecting Nigeria – Kanu

Addressing the court, a furious Kanu questioned why he was brought before Justice Nyako. He said all that the judge said was meaningless to him. He said he does not recognise the authority of the court presided by Justice Nyako over him.

The IPOB leader said he was only in court because of the respect he has for the rule of law, adding that the judge had previously recused herself from the case.

Kanu said he was not happy with the decision of the chief judge who returned the case to Justice Nyako, insisting that the prosecution cannot prosecute him.

The IPOB leader insisted that Justice Nyako is biased over his case and should not preside over his case. He said poor knowledge of the court is affecting Nigeria.

The prosecution counsel took an objection to Kanu’s remarks and asked for a definite date for the hearing since the prosecution has refused to file a written application. Awomolo said it was not right for Kanu to insult the court.

Despite Kanu’s objection, Justice Nyako adjourned his case indefinitely.

Related articles

Let Plateau Breathe Again: Governor Mutfwang Confronts The Painful Truth About Cattle Rustling And Violence

By: Zagazola Makama There are moments in the life of a troubled society when the most important thing a...

Hamzat Support Group Launches Digital Platform For Lagos Residents

The KOH Impact Network, a support group for Dr Obafemi Hamzat, has launched a digital platform to enable...

TCM Demands Judicial Accountability Over ADC Judgment

TCM RAISES ALARM OVER ADC JUDGMENT, DEMANDS JUDICIAL ACCOUNTABILITY, TRANSPARENCY AND PROTECTION OF NIGERIA'S DEMOCRACY Abuja, Nigeria | November...

Lifu’s Constitutional Error: Failure To Apply ADC Article 17(4), Interim Succession And The Absence Of Automatic Elevation Of Nafiu Bala Gombe

By Alex Ter Adum, PhD The fundamental error in Lifu's determination of the ADC leadership dispute lies in its...